Re: libssh2 gmake check failed

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> Thus, to me, it doesn't seem to be highly portable code
>
> I beg to differ.

I think you are talking past each other. The test case is not at all
portable, this is likely point.

> Perhaps a more productive way forward is to continue helping us
> improving what we have?

It is helpful - bugs in tests matter too. If noone can fix the test
(I can't) then I think it's better to take the test out.

//Peter
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2010-01-09