Subject: Re: [libssh2] [PATCH] libtool and automake?

Re: [libssh2] [PATCH] libtool and automake?

From: James Housley <jim_at_thehousleys.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:01:56 -0500

On Nov 11, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
>> So, would anyone object if I made the transition to use these tools?
>
> Okay, so there is a patch in the patch tracker already that does
> this, but it contains lots of non-related stuff (#1479121 by Koen
> D'Hondt).
>
> Still, I tried to incorporate the good parts from that and here's
> my take.
>
> Now, run 'buildconf' in the source root to setup the configure
> scripts and related stuff. Then run make as usual.
>
> Seems to work for me.
>
> (this patch relies somewhat on some of the previous changes I
> already submitted)
> <automake_libtool.patch>

Would there be any harm in changing

AC_INIT(libssh2, 0.15, libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(libssh2, 0.15)

to

AC_INIT(libssh2, 0.15-CVS, libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(libssh2, 0.15-CVS)

Or would that break other stuff?

Jim

--
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
  X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
jeh@FreeBSD.org      http://www.FreeBSD.org     The Power to Serve
jim@TheHousleys.Net  http://www.TheHousleys.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The wise man built his network upon Un*x.
     The foolish man built his network upon Windows.
Received on 2006-11-14