On Nov 11, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
>> So, would anyone object if I made the transition to use these tools?
>
> Okay, so there is a patch in the patch tracker already that does
> this, but it contains lots of non-related stuff (#1479121 by Koen
> D'Hondt).
>
> Still, I tried to incorporate the good parts from that and here's
> my take.
>
> Now, run 'buildconf' in the source root to setup the configure
> scripts and related stuff. Then run make as usual.
>
> Seems to work for me.
>
> (this patch relies somewhat on some of the previous changes I
> already submitted)
> <automake_libtool.patch>
Would there be any harm in changing
AC_INIT(libssh2, 0.15, libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(libssh2, 0.15)
to
AC_INIT(libssh2, 0.15-CVS, libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net)
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(libssh2, 0.15-CVS)
Or would that break other stuff?
Jim
-- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- The wise man built his network upon Un*x. The foolish man built his network upon Windows.Received on 2006-11-14