> My intention is to build an abstraction layer, and have it be used
> everywhere in libssh2. Btw, libgcrypt is not licensed under GPL and
> doesn't have its viral habits. In any case, I believe whether to use
> OpenSSL or libgcrypt should be up to the user. Is this an acceptable
> approach?
>
Oh good, I'm not sure where I got that impression about libgcrypt then.
But in either case, yes. I'm all for that approach, the more choice
the end-user has the better.
> Has anyone had a chance to look at my patch to fix the first problem
> with crypto abstraction? Here is an updated patch against latest CVS.
>
This patch is exactly what I had in mind for the crypto-abstraction
originally (but gave up on due to laziness). By all means apply it.
Or do you not have a CVS account yet? Send me your sourceforge username
if not, and I'll add you.
-Sara
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2006-11-21