On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:58:16PM -0400, James Housley wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> In a quick test I noticed that using libssh2 to sftp a file takes
>>> more
>>> than 20 times longer than using libssh2 to scp the same file from
>>> the
>>> same server. I haven't done any profiling (well, I tried but the
>>> profiling tools on my mac os x laptop consistently crashed! I should
>>> check that things are properly installed) but wonder if anyone has a
>>> clue why this would be the case.
>>
>> What version of the library are you working with? There is also many
>> changing being done in the version that is in CVS related to blocking
>> calls. But this doesn't mean there aren't slowdowns written into the
>> code.
>
> libssh2-0.15-20070426 snapshot.
I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking
work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the
older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that?
Jim
-- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines" -- Anon ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-develReceived on 2007-04-30