Daniel Stenberg <daniel-7AX/Qt632QQ_at_public.gmane.org> writes:
> Yes,
>
> I said I wanted a 1.0 release next, but it feels like instead of considering
> if we're at that stage yet I thought we better first ship a 0.16[.0] with the
> bug fixes, the new header style version number etc done since 0.15.
>
> I think we're quite prepared then to make the following release a 1.0.
>
> So, is there any objections or things we should wait for before we can put a
> 0.16 together?
Go for it! It seems 0.15 had some bugs that are now fixed, so the
current state can't be that much worse. I'm all for
release-early-release-often.
/Simon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2007-08-06