Subject: Re: comparing with libssh

Re: comparing with libssh

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:40:48 +0200 (CEST)

On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote:

>> 693M bytes file took 21.89 seconds. Speed: 31.6MB/sec
>> 693M bytes file took 50.96 seconds. Speed: 13.6MB/sec
>
> I'm curious if there is any difference in encryption/MAC algorithm choice
> between these libraries?

Hm, yes that's indeed a sensible question. I'm not sure I can figure that out
easily. Both my tested libs were built against (the same) OpenSSL btw.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2009-06-13