Alexander Lamaison wrote:
> > And related, do you still get problems if you (as a temporary
> > work-around) use a smaller buffer?
>
> That would work. It's what I used to do when libssh2 had severe
> problems that limited buffer size to something like 32k.
I guess the question is if it still works with the changes that have
been made to the SFTP support in libssh2.
But no doubt we want to fix this once and for all so that buffer
sizes really are arbitrary numbers as far as the library is
concerned.
I believe it's done at transport level at least, only SFTP left. :)
//Peter
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2011-09-11