Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> It still means slightly more work for the lazy MSVC "include all files
> into a project" people but at least we offer a fairly easy solution.
They also get a .dsp to click on.
>> Do you prefer that I apply it on top of the existing master, or that I
>> revert d512b25 and squash the new commit into d512b25 so that the entire
>> change is in a single commit and that we don't have the broken
>> Makefile.inc state in-between?
>
> I'm not sure I understand. What you've already pushed cannot be changed,
> so just go ahead apply on master.
Yes, sorry, the only benefit would be that the state of the files
directly preceding the commit would not be the broken in-between.
//Peter
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2013-09-18