Hello everyone,
On 13.03.2014 20:39, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Yes, we should find a solution for this. Marc, did you notice if
> there *is* a reason not to always compile those first functions?
> Let's see if we can hammer this one out.
no, I did not find a reason not to always compile those functions.
Attached you will find patch 0002 which removes the ifdef-checks before
the WinCNG patch.
> Yes, I overlooked the define. :( Please have a look at the attached
> patch. If you think it's OK I'll push it.
It's much better than my initial patch, thanks. Since I had some trouble
with your patch using CRLF line endings for all files, even the
non-Windows specific ones, I reformatted the patch using msysgit and the
latest master branch with core.autocrlf being false. Please see attached
patch 0001.
I also found a warning while compiling with the win32/GNUmakefile,
please see attached patch 0003.
It would be great if you could merge these patches, so I can rebase the
WinCNG patch onto them. Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Marc