Salvador Fandino wrote:
> Note that I am not against that plan. I just think it shouldn't be
> done until at least the most recent PRs are reviewed.
Remember that what Daniel has found and addressed has happened
because of a lack of basic peer review practice.
That lack of review has certainly made the codebase even more of a
mess than it already was, so it seems quite unlikely that there will
magically be review to guide and finally incorporate open PRs.
> anecdotal evidence that the project is not very good at getting new
> people involved
IMO it is always the responsibility of new people to get involved in
the project, not the other way around.
//Peter
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel https://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2019-03-19