On May 1, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0400, James Housley wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking
>> work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the
>> older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that?
>
> I am afraid that I have never tried libssh2-0.14, sorry. I'll look if
> I get the chance.
That is fine, just curious. Slower is not good, just wonder if it
was slow to begin with. How are you doing your test?
Jim
-- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Fortune Not Found: Abort, Retry, Ignore? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-develReceived on 2007-05-01