On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:44:24AM -0400, James Housley wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2007, at 1:25 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:38:56PM -0400, James Housley wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 30, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >>
> >> I know there are changes in that code related to the non-blocking
> >> work in the sftp path. Just out of curiosity, have you compared the
> >> older 0.14 version? Are we better or worse then that?
> >
> > I am afraid that I have never tried libssh2-0.14, sorry. I'll look if
> > I get the chance.
>
> That is fine, just curious. Slower is not good, just wonder if it
> was slow to begin with. How are you doing your test?
I started with curl, noticed a significant speed difference with
sftp:// and scp:// urls, then, to eliminate curl as a possibility, I
modified the examples scp_nonblock and sftp_nonblock to connect to a
remote server grab a file from there and write it to stdout. I have
been using non-trivial files, between 90 and 700Mb in testing (`cat
/dev/urandom > /tmp/TEST` for varying lengths of time).
Peter
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2007-05-01