On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Can't we use a make target for this, rather than a script? I'm thinking
> 'make indent'.
Yeah, sure. But I don't think people will use it uncondionally on a lot of
source files very often so it will make more sense to be used like
"./indent.sh mynewfile.c" or similar.
> Really my concern is that there are now several scripts in the top-level
> directory; maketgz, get_ver.awk, buildconf.. That feels somewhat messy to
> me, although I may be over-pedantic. Should we move those to a build-aux/
> sub-directory?
Yeah, we could or perhaps should. Feel free to clean up.
> is there a reason for using the buildconf script rather than the recommended
> 'autoreconf --install'?
Recommended by who/what? I've never seen nor used autoreconf! I personally
don't care much what we call the script, I just picked a name I use in a few
other projects.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2007-08-07