From: Jean-Louis CHARTON <Jean-Louis.CHARTON_at_oikialog.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:01:28 +0100

Hi Peter,

Of course you can't know this; but I don't have much time to produce "really great parches". You're right, it would require me more work, spending much more time reading libssh2 code, etc, etc and unfortunately, I can't at this moment.
On the other hand, I could also just do nothing at all to help. But well, after all; maybe my suggestion to make the publickeyfile parameter optional is not interesting at all.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Peter Stuge [mailto:peter_at_stuge.se]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 mars 2009 17:23
À : libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: RE : RE : For the interested ones :libssh2_userauth_publickey_fromfileandlibssh2_userauth_hostbased_fromfile with no need of the publickeyfile

Hi Jean-Louis,

Jean-Louis CHARTON wrote:
> How can I know for example that the libssh2_session_free() or other
> libssh2_session_xxxx functions will not in fact do a free on the
> session fields that are non NULL pointers?

You can find out. Much quicker than waiting for a reply. :)

> Remember, that I'm new to libssh2.

Please don't hide behind that. If you want to produce really great
patches you can - even without talking to any other developers - but
I agree that there is more work to it than just typing the code.

In this case, maybe a grep for free or the struct name is all you
need. Simply put: Use the source. :)

//Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel

RE : RE : RE : For the interested ones :libssh2_userauth_publickey_fromfileandlibssh2_userauth_hostbased_fromfile with no need of the publickeyfile