Alexander Lamaison wrote:
> shouldn't the question be why are we including windows.h rather
> than the winsock header?
We want some stuff from windows.h, and to me it seems appropriate to
include it explicitly, but of course we could go the other way and
only include winsock2.h and rely on it including windows.h. Matter of
taste?
//Peter
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2011-10-31