Subject: Re: [PATCH] Follow RFC4253 section 11.4

Re: [PATCH] Follow RFC4253 section 11.4

From: Steven Dake <>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:36:56 -0700

On 03/05/2012 10:14 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Henrik Nordström wrote:
>> For now we need your patch but with corrected comments and description.
>> It's the wrong thing, but much better than doing nothing.
> Hm? I think doing the wrong thing isn't such a good idea?
> If we want to assist library users (I do) I think what we could do is
> return an error for _keepalive_send() until it's safe to send one.

It is keepalive_config which triggers the want_replys (keepalive_send
doesn't take a want reply parameter)

Plus man page description - I tend to agree.


> //Peter
> _______________________________________________
> libssh2-devel

Received on 2012-03-06