tis 2012-03-06 klockan 06:14 +0100 skrev Peter Stuge:
> Henrik Nordström wrote:
> > For now we need your patch but with corrected comments and description.
> > It's the wrong thing, but much better than doing nothing.
>
> Hm? I think doing the wrong thing isn't such a good idea?
It is a small step towards a better result.
> If we want to assist library users (I do) I think what we could do is
> return an error for _keepalive_send() until it's safe to send one.
That too, but is unrelated other than attempting to send keep-alive too
early before protocol is active triggers the problem.
Regards
Henrik
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2012-03-06