On Fri, March 16, 2012 13:36, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> It might cause confusion and badness.
:-)
Thanks for the quick responses!
>> a clearer asynchronous API should be implemented, and a synchronous one
>> which builds on that.
>
> We've discussed something like that but nobody has yet volunteered to do the
> work so we keep to the old and existing API...
Interesting. I'm working on a product which builds on libssh2, and depending
on how that plays out, there could be mutual benefits in helping out with
libssh2... at the moment I'm swamped in work however. :-P
-- Best regards, Tom Weber Cryptzone Group AB _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-develReceived on 2012-03-16