Subject: Re: crypto library checks [was: 1.8.0]

Re: crypto library checks [was: 1.8.0]

From: Peter Stuge <>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:15:30 +0000

Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Thursday, October 27, 2016 01:05:08 Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Also, I would like to argue that given --with-x but no x found should
> > be considered a fatal error by configure. Any objections to that?
> Sounds like a good idea. By fatal error, you mean to return non-zero exit
> status from configure script, or exit immediately and skip all the remaining
> checks?
> I would prefer the former.

Right, certainly exit non-zero.

I was thinking exiting then and there (with a useful error message)
when the requested x is not available.

Why do you prefer running more checks when a failure can't be avoided


Received on 2016-10-27