Subject: Re: crypto library checks [was: 1.8.0]

Re: crypto library checks [was: 1.8.0]

From: Peter Stuge <>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:30:40 +0000

Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > Also, I would like to argue that given --with-x but no x found should
> > be considered a fatal error by configure. Any objections to that?
> Sounds like a good idea.

This would also mean that
--with-{openssl,libgcrypt,wincng,mbedtls,axtls} become mutually
exclusive, which makes a lot of sense.

How about moving to --with-crypto=x ?

And maybe also a single common --with-crypto-prefix= though I'm less
sure there?

Received on 2016-10-27