On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> Note, the "signal" request is open-ended and allows for other signals to be
> sent in addition to what is explicitly listed in the RFC.
Ouch. Good point and thanks for bringing in some facts here... I guess it
teaches me to actually check the spec first!
> I do not think the API should restrict to only RFC4254 defined signals.
> Not even sure we should sanity check them.
Right. Back to a string in the API I guess...
-- / daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2011-10-18