On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Mitchell Hashimoto wrote:
> Instead, I believe it would be nice to do something like the following:
>
> int libssh2_session_ready_channels(LIBSSH2_SESSION *, LIBSSH2_CHANNEL **)
(just quickly popping in while still away on vacation)
This looks like a way I would prefer (since it would avoid callbacks and it
would allow users to a large extent keep using the existing API). Possibly it
could be made to return more than one channel so that the application can
select in which order to handle them.
-- / daniel.haxx.se _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-develReceived on 2012-03-02