On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Steven Dake wrote:
> I made this change to stop getting the 82 packets which were causing the
> leaks.
>
> I am not in favor of asserting the lib when packet 3 is received. There are
> probably many conditions under which the error packet 3 could be received
> with different ssh daemons (I am using openssh for the server atm). I'd
> prefer it be rejected silently (or given back to the api caller) over an
> assertion.
Hey!
I've not really caught up the backs and forths of this discussion. Is there an
outcome or patch suggested or where do we stand on the leak thing?
-- / daniel.haxx.se _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-develReceived on 2012-03-05