Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use safer snprintf rather then sprintf in scp_send()

Re: [PATCH] Use safer snprintf rather then sprintf in scp_send()

From: Alexander Lamaison <swish_at_lammy.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:47:04 +0000

On 6 March 2012 23:24, Steven Dake <sdake_at_redhat.com> wrote:

> Wasn't sure if libssh2 community would be interested in these sorts of
> janitorial patches.  I have a coverity license and it kicks out about 90
> problems.  I can only handle doing 2 or 3 at a time before I get bored,
> so more should be coming over time :)  Best way to coverity-ize a
> project is slow with lots of breaks inbetween ;)  I find coverity a bit
> noisy, but it does improve code quality a bit.

'Janitorial' patches are very welcome. IMHO we don't do enough of them.

Alex 

--
Swish - Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer (http://www.swish-sftp.org)
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2012-03-07